IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/6983716.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nonparametric tests for jump detection via false discovery rate control: a Monte Carlo study

Author

Listed:
  • Kaiqiao Li
  • Kan He
  • Lizhou Nie
  • Wei Zhu
  • Pei Fen Kuan

Abstract

Nonparametric tests are popular and efficient methods of detecting jumps in high- frequency financial data. Each method has its own advantages and disadvantages, and their performances may be affected by underlying noise and dynamic structures. To address this, we proposed a robust p-value pooling method that aims to combine the advantages of each method. We focus on model validation within a Monte Carlo framework to assess the reproducibility and false discovery rate (FDR). Reproducible analyses via a correspondence curve and an irreproducible discovery rate were analyzed with replicates to study local dependency and robustness across replicates. Extensive simulation studies of high-frequency trading data at a minute level were carried out, and the operating characteristics of these methods were compared via the FDR control framework. Our proposed method was robust across all scenarios under reproducibility and FDR analysis. Finally, we applied this method to minute-level data from the limit order book system: the efficient reconstruction system (LOBSTER). An R package JumpTest implementing these methods has been made available on the Comprehensive R Archive Network.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:6983716
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2019-09/Nonparametric_tests_for_jump_detection_via_false_discovery_rate_control.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:6983716. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.