IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/6547061.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An optimized support vector machine intelligent technique using optimized feature selection methods: evidence from Chinese credit approval data

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Zoynul Abedin
  • Chi Guotai
  • Fahmida - E - Moula
  • Tong Zhang
  • M. Kabir Hassan

Abstract

This paper focuses on feature selection methods for support vector machine (SVM) classifiers, checking their optimality by comparing them with some statistical and baseline methods. To achieve the above objective, we exploit twelve feature selection methods from the family of filters and embedded approaches by splitting a Chinese database. Our findings suggest that the average result from sample division cases will achieve a more robust prediction ability than that from “no sample division†cases. Moreover, ridge regression (SVM9) in training and “average results from sample division†data sets, along with DTQUEST (SVM7) in “no sample division†example sets, give outstanding performance with respect to all performance criteria. With these contributions, therefore, our paper complements previous evidence and modernizes the methods of feature selection to render SVM classifiers favorable for credit approval data modeling. This study has practical implications for financial institutions, managers, employees, investors and government officials looking to sort out forthcoming lending transactions to attain a target risk/return trade-off.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:6547061
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2019-06/An_optimized_SVM_intelligent_technique.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:6547061. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.