IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/5720571.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the risk performance of online peer-to-peer lending platforms in China

Author

Listed:
  • Chong Wu
  • Dong Zhang
  • Ying Wang

Abstract

Peer-to-peer (P2P) lending, which has received considerable research attention in recent years, has emerged as a viable platform to provide an alternative way of financing without the help of traditional intermediaries such as banks. However, P2P lending platforms have experienced risks in China, and previous research mainly focuses on using subjective methods for constructing and assessing the risk index system of P2P platforms. We propose a novel approach to establishing a risk index system based on previous research and real-world data, selected using correlation analysis and principal component analysis. Moreover, the entropy-revised G1 combination method has been used in this paper to assess the risk performance of P2P lending platforms, with both expert knowledge and real-world data taken into account. In this paper, we use information contribution to show the constructed risk index system is valid. In addition, we rank the ninety-two P2P lending platforms based on their calculated risk evaluation scores, which are further tested with the ranking offered by China’s rating agency using Spearman’s coefficient. Testing results show the proposed risk assessment for P2P platforms in China is rational and efficient, giving us unique insight into how to evaluate the risk performance of P2P platforms, and thus can be used by regulators to better supervise these platforms in China.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:5720571
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2018-06/Risk_assessment_for_P2P_lending_platforms_in_China.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:5720571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.