IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/5267071.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forecasting scenarios from the perspective of a reverse stress test using second-order cone programming

Author

Listed:
  • Katsuhiro Tanaka

Abstract

This paper proposes a model for forecasting scenarios from the perspective of a reverse stress test using interest rate (JGB10Y yield), equity (Nikkei 225) and foreign exchange (US$/U) data. The model consists of (i) a constraint with error terms of dynamic conditional correlation–generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (DCC–GARCH) for expressing risk factors (RFs) located in an acceptable range, where the acceptable range is determined by the Mahalanobis distance, which consists of error terms of DCC–GARCH and the correlation between one RF and another RF; and (ii) maximization of the objection function, which is the loss of market portfolio (ie, minimization of the difference of a market portfolio). I also show that (i) forecasting scenarios identified by this model are valid in terms of expressing very stressful data, which documents that some financial institutions may be in default, and that there is a mostly distributed multivariate normal distribution; and (ii) this model can be solved by formulating second-order cone programming, which is standard in the field of mathematical optimization programming. I expect this paper will be of interest to researchers and practitioners in the fields of stress testing and risk management.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:5267071
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2017-06/Forecasting_scenarios_from_the_perspective_of_a_reverse_stress_test.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:5267071. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.