Author
Abstract
ABSTRACT House price corrections have been a cause of financial crises and continue to be a concern. Both A-paper and alternative A-paper lending are vulnerable to potential house price corrections. The loan-to-value (LTV) ratio is a key metric used for deal acceptance, and loss given default (LGD) largely drives the capital assigned to the deal. Yet both the LTV calculations and the LGD estimations under the advanced internal ratings-based approach (A-IRB) may have significant biases. The historical loss data used for calibration may come from a period when house prices were going up. There could also be appraisal biases that need to be taken into account. These biases may result in a significant understatement of LGDs and LTVs, especially during a period when house prices may no longer be going up, or, worse, be subject to a correction. Regulators, concerned about this possibility, are establishing floors for LGDs. We propose a prudent methodology to correct for potential biases in LGD estimations due to historical price appreciations, appraisal biases and wear-and-tear or potential damage to the house. This methodology can be used to estimate both through-the-cycle (TTC) LGD and forward-looking point-in-time (PIT) LGDs based on expected house prices. We also show that it can be used for stress testing as well as estimating a term structure for LGDs as required by the International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 9. We provide an empirical analysis to demonstrate the application of the methodology.
Suggested Citation
Bogie Ozdemir, .
"A prudent loss given default estimation for mortgages,"
Journal of Risk Model Validation, Journal of Risk Model Validation.
Handle:
RePEc:rsk:journ5:2476044
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2476044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.