IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/2476042.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A quick tool to forecast value-at-risk using implied and realized volatilities

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Cesarone
  • Stefano Colucci

Abstract

ABSTRACT We propose a naive model to forecast ex ante value-at-risk (VaR), using a shrinkage estimator between realized volatility estimated on past return time series as well as implied volatility quoted in the market. Implied volatility is often indicated as the operator's expectation about future risk, while historical volatility straightforwardly represents the realized risk prior to the estimation point, which by definition is backward looking. Therefore, our VaR prediction strategy uses information both on expected future risk and past estimated risk. We examine our model, called shrun volatility VaR, in both the univariate and multivariate cases, empirically comparing its forecasting power with that of four benchmark VaR models. The performance of all VaR models is evaluated using both statistical accuracy and efficiency evaluation tests; this is done according to the Basel II and European Securities and Markets Authority regulatory frameworks, on several major markets, over an out-of-sample period that covers different financial crises. Our results confirm the efficacy of implied volatility indexes as inputs for a VaR model, but only when combined with realized volatilities. Further, due to its ease of implementation, our VaR prediction strategy could be used as a tool for portfolio managers to quickly monitor investment decisions before employing more sophisticated risk management systems.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2476042
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/10696/A_quick_tool_to_forecast_value_at_risk.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2476042. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.