IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/2460734.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A point-in-time–through-the-cycle approach to rating assignment and probability of default calibration

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Rubtsov
  • Alexandre Petrov

Abstract

ABSTRACT In order to be compliant with the Basel regulations and the upcoming International Financial Reporting Standard 9, banks need two probabilities of default (PDs): point-in-time (PIT) and through-the-cycle (TTC). The existing methodologies assume that banks already have a customer-specific hybrid PD, which is then adjusted to PIT and TTC. We avoid this assumption and focus instead on a two-step process to obtain a PD, namely, rating assignment and calibration. In the first step, we propose a methodology for constructing TTC rating grades and assessing the resulting degree of PIT-ness. For calibration, we let the rating-grade default threshold be stochastic. This move enables us to quantify the impact of estimation errors, provides a justification for the size of;a regulatory margin of conservatism and has direct implications for validation tests. We illustrate our proposals on a sample portfolio of corporate customers, although we believe these ideas should be applicable in retail too. Addendum to Rubtsov and Petrov (2016): “A point-in-time–through-the-cycle approach to rating assignment and probability of default calibrationâ€

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Rubtsov & Alexandre Petrov, . "A point-in-time–through-the-cycle approach to rating assignment and probability of default calibration," Journal of Risk Model Validation, Journal of Risk Model Validation.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2460734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation/technical-paper/2460734/a-point-in-time-through-the-cycle-approach-to-rating-assignment-and-probability-of-default-calibration
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2460734. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.