IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/2449102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An application of sensitivity analysis to hedge funds

Author

Listed:
  • Greg N. Gregoriou and Razvan Pascalau

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe present study investigates a sample of 142 live hedge funds via a data envelopment analysis (DEA) sensitivity analysis using a super-efficiency model. We use data from;Barclay Hedge to examine the sensitivity of six inputs (ie, the standard deviation of monthly returns, management and performance fees, leverage, number of employees and portfolio net exposure). We emphasize in particular the impact of the net portfolio exposure and the number of employees, which have not been considered before. The sensitivity analysis model analyzes the stability of hedge funds as a result of changes in inputs. DEA will identify which hedge funds have more efficient operations, and the sensitivity analysis will show which inputs are sensitive to the results of a fund's;operations. The evidence in the paper shows that, with the exception of the sensitivity to leverage, only 42% of all funds achieve efficiency status. The rest appear inefficient. When leverage is considered, approximately 75% of all funds are efficient or super-efficient. Using regression analysis, the study provides a further in-depth analysis of the factors that affect the efficiency status with respect to each input. The results in this paper have implications for financial risk management and risk model validation.;

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2449102
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/9578/An_application_of_sensitivity_analysis_to_hedge_funds.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2449102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.