IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/2413891.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stress testing and modeling of rating migration under the Vasicek model framework: empirical approaches and technical implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Bill Huajian Yang and Zunwei Du

Abstract

ABSTRACT Under the Vasicek asymptotic single risk factor model, stress testing based on rating transition probability involves three components: the unconditional rating transition matrix, asset correlations and stress testing factor models for systematic downgrade (including default) risk. Conditional transition probability for stress testing given systematic risk factors can be derived accordingly. In this paper, we extend the work of Miu and Ozdemir on stress testing under this transition probability framework by using different asset correlations and different stress testing factor models for each nondefault rating. We propose two Vasicek models for each nondefault rating, one with a single latent factor for rating level asset correlations and another multifactor Vasicek model with a latent effect for systematic downgrade risk. Both models can be fitted effectively by using, for example, the SAS nonlinear mixed procedure. Analytical formulas for conditional transition probabilities are derived. Modeling downgrade risk rather than default risk addresses the issue of low default counts for high-quality ratings. As an illustration, we model the transition probabilities of a corporate portfolio. Portfolio default risk and credit loss under stress scenarios are derived accordingly. Our results show that stress testing models developed in this way demonstrate the desired sensitivity to risk factors that is generally expected. ;

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2413891
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/8940/Stress_testing_and_modeling_of_rating_migration_under_the_Vasicek_model_framework_empirical_approaches_and_technical_implementation.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2413891. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.