Author
Listed:
- Jie Zhang and Lyn C. Thomas
Abstract
ABSTRACT We demonstrate how introducing economic variables into a credit scorecard improves the predictive power of that scorecard. Such a scorecard can forecast default rates accurately, even when economic conditions change. This means we can develop a single-step approach to estimate the point-in-time probabilities of default (PDs), which are required by the Basel Accords' banking regulations. A one-step approach has several advantages over the more standard approach, which involves first estimating scores with no economic variables, then segmenting the portfolio by score bands and estimating the PD per segment. To build such a scorecard, we decompose it into the population odds and weights of evidence.We show that economic variables model the dynamics of the population odds part of the scorecard, which leads to an improvement in prediction. We then apply this extension to credit scoring to a real problem in invoice discounting. This is when banks lend to small businesses using the invoices that the businesses have issued as collateral. There is a significant volume of such lending, but it is not often addressed in the literature. The scorecards used to assess the risk of default of such small businesses are very similar to the behavioral scorecards used to assess default risk in lending to consumers. The results show that modeling the population odds by economic variables is very effective, but there is little improvement in the scorecard's performance if we model the dynamics of the weights of evidence by adding interactions between the economic variables and the performance characteristics of the borrowing firm.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:rsk:journ5:2400829
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2400829. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.