IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/2385774.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The interrelation of stock markets in China, Taiwan and Hong Kong and their constructional portfolio’s value-at-risk estimate

Author

Listed:
  • Jung-Bin Su

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study employs a bivariate asymmetric generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (GARCH) model to estimate the return, variance and covariance for three stock-based portfolios composed of two alternative indexes of the stock markets in China, Hong Kong and Taiwan, explores the return and volatility spillover effects between two indexes of the portfolio constructed and estimates the out-of-sample value-at-risk (VaR). Using the effective validation framework proposed by the Board of Governors of the US Federal Reserve System, this study finds that, as shown in the price levels and spillover effects on return and volatility, the stock markets in these three regions are closely related and are significantly positively correlated. Moreover, there is a volatility feedback effect in China's stock market and a significant leverage effect in the Hong Kong and Taiwan stock markets. Furthermore, via the construction of portfolios, market risk can be reduced and the stock-based portfolio, which is composed of stock indexes in China and Taiwan, has the optimal risk dispersion. Finally, from the performance competition of alternative VaR models, two semiparametric approaches, weighted historical simulation (WHS) and, in particular, filtered historical simulation (FHS), can reduce the underestimation of the true risk caused by an inappropriate return distribution setting of the parametric approach. Moreover, the effects of this approach are more influential than the leverage effect on the VaR estimates. Hence, the FHS approach with the asymmetric volatility specification model, FHS-B-JR, is optimal, enabling precise forecasting of theVaR. In addition, regarding the backtesting, the loss functions are more sensitive than the accuracy measure tests.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2385774
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/8427/jrmv_su_webDec2014.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2385774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.