Author
Listed:
- Sebastian Schnitzler, Niklas Rother, Holger Plank and Peter Glößner
Abstract
ABSTRACT Backtesting for counterparty credit risk (CCR) constitutes a major challenge for risk and trading departments in banks that use internal models or have an interest in calculating their credit default exposures for potential future exposure limitation or credit valuation adjustment trading purposes. A market standard for long-term exposure validation has not yet been established, despite the fact that several software solutions are already available. This may be due to the lack of legally binding regulations at present. In this paper, we discuss various problems around regulatory requirements for backtesting.We argue that it is possible to set up a backtesting framework that works for both full revaluation and American Monte Carlo techniques, and which achieves high performance via the reuse of previously simulated data. Our proposed framework combines market risk methodology (such as the traffic light approach) and statistical methods (such as goodness-of-fit tests for uniform distributions). Among other things, we investigate problems related to the long-term aspects of CCR and show that, due to long time horizons and overlapping data, it is necessary to enhance the existing market risk backtesting frameworks. Furthermore, we introduce several publications that discuss details of or alternative approaches to exposure backtesting. The results of this paper may be of interest to financial institutions and suppliers who intend to validate their long-term credit default exposure models.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:rsk:journ5:2385769
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2385769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.