IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/2385759.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forecasting value-at-risk for frontier stock market indexes using GARCH-type models and extreme value theory: model validation for dynamic models

Author

Listed:
  • Dany Allan Nicholas Ng Cheong Vee, Preethee Nunkoo Gonpot and Noor Ul Hacq Sookia

Abstract

ABSTRACT We discuss the relative performances of value-at-risk (VaR) models using generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (GARCH), Glosten-Jagannathan-Runkle GARCH and integrated GARCH (IGARCH) for volatility forecasting, and extreme value theory (EVT) for approximating the fat tails of the standardized residuals. For the volatility estimation with two underlying distributions(normal and skewed t), we find that this affects the forecasted VaR figures in most cases. The peak over threshold method is used for estimating the tail of losses of the standardized residuals. The models obtained are applied to six frontier market indexes and backtested/validated using hypothesis tests and loss functions. We observe that the dynamic EVT models generally perform well, except for the Sri Lankan index, for which no model could be identified. Finally, we find that a dynamic EVT with an IGARCH volatility specification works well for four out of the six indexes considered, which may indicate that this model may suit other indexes from other frontier markets. We thus find that a mixed approach to VaR estimation using volatility models and EVT provides an appropriate framework for effectively estimating market risk.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2385759
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/8425/jrmv_ng_webDec2014.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2385759. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.