IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/2370518.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling systematic risk and point-in-time probability of default under the Vasicek asymptotic single-risk-factor model framework

Author

Listed:
  • Bill Huajian Yang

Abstract

ABSTRACT Systematic risk has long been a focus for stress testing and risk capital assessment. Under the Vasicek asymptotic single-risk-factor model framework, entity default risk for a risk homogeneous portfolio divides into two parts: systematic and entity-specific. While entity-specific risk can be modeled by a probit or logistic model using a relatively short period of portfolio historical data, modeling of systematic risk is more challenging. In practice, most default risk models do not fully or dynamically capture systematic risk. In this paper, we propose an approach to modeling systematic and entity-specific risks by parts and then aggregating together analytically. Systematic risk is quantified and modeled by a multifactor Vasicek model with a latent residual, a factor accounting for default contagion and feedback effects. The asymptotic maximum likelihood approach for parameter estimation for this model is equivalent to least squares linear regression. Conditional entity probabilities of default (PDs) for scenario tests and through-the-cycle entity PDs all have analytical solutions. For validation, we model the point-in-time entity PD for a commercial portfolio and stress the portfolio default risk by shocking the systematic risk factors. Rating migration and portfolio loss are assessed. ;

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2370518
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/8192/jrmv_yang_web_sept_2014.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2370518. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.