IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/2370503.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensitivity analysis of risk measurement for catastrophe losses caused by natural disasters

Author

Listed:
  • Myung Suk Kim

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this paper, we examine the sensitivity of risk measurement for losses caused by natural catastrophes. Annual losses from natural disasters for sixteen cities and provinces in South Korea during the period 1979-2011 are used for the case study. Various distributions are suggested for modeling loss distribution, and they are evaluated using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Test results indicate that normal mixture and lognormal distributions are suitable for modeling the losses in several districts. Using these distributions and annual value-at-risk, losses for one-in-ten-year, one-in-twenty-year and one-in-a-hundred-year events are estimated for each district. The corresponding event-to-budget ratios are reported, to examine their impacts on government budgets. Our empirical results show that risk measurements for potential catastrophe losses are very sensitive, according to the assumed loss distributions. This study may help improve governments' risk-based decision-making strategies in the event of natural disasters. ;

Suggested Citation

  • Myung Suk Kim, . "Sensitivity analysis of risk measurement for catastrophe losses caused by natural disasters," Journal of Risk Model Validation, Journal of Risk Model Validation.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2370503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation/2370503/sensitivity-analysis-of-risk-measurement-for-catastrophe-losses-caused-by-natural-disasters
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2370503. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.