IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/2350369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An analytic approach to quantify the sensitivity of CreditRisk+ with respect to its underlying assumptions

Author

Listed:
  • Matthias Fischer and Florian Kaufmann

Abstract

ABSTRACT In contrast to most of its competitors, the derivation of the portfolio loss distribution is straightforward within an analytic framework, and results are available almost in real time, even for larger portfolios. However, CreditRisk+ relies on certain distributional assumptions that directly affect the shape of the loss distribution and, therefore, the corresponding risk figures. To adhere to current regulatory requirements, banks are required to quantify how sensitive their models (and the resulting risk figures) are if fundamental assumptions are modified. If one or more assumptions are changed within a standard CreditRisk+ framework, the analytical solution is no longer available. Against this backdrop, we introduce the so-called MRCP model (MRCP is an abbreviation of "modified ratio calculandi periculi"). On the one hand, this model enables us to calculate sensitivities for the basic CreditRisk+ model within an analytical framework; on the other hand, it can be used for risk calculation in its own right. Furthermore, we provide results for test calculations for a hypothetical portfolio.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2350369
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/7899/jrmv_fischer_press_ready.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2350369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.