IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/2335499.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling portfolio risk by risk discriminatory trees and random forests

Author

Listed:
  • Bill Huajian Yang

Abstract

ABSTRACT Common tree-splitting strategies involve minimizing a criterion function for minimum impurity (ie, difference) within child nodes. In this paper, we propose an approach based on maximizing a discriminatory criterion for maximum risk difference between child nodes. Maximum discriminatory separation based on risk is expected in credit risk scoring and rating. The search algorithm for an optimal split, proposed in this paper, is efficient and simple, just a scan through the data set. Choices of different trees, with options either more or less aggressive in variable splitting, are made possible. Two special cases are shown to relate to the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and the intracluster correlation statistics. As a validation of the proposed approaches, we estimate the exposure at default for a commercial portfolio. Results show that the risk discriminatory trees, constructed and selected using the bagging and random forest techniques, are robust. It is expected that the tools presented in this paper will add value to general portfolio risk modeling.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2335499
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/7635/jrmv_yang_march_2014_web.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2335499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.