IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/2335488.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A statistical repertoire for quantitative loss given default validation: overview, illustration, pitfalls and extensions

Author

Listed:
  • Matthias Fischer and Marius Pfeuffer

Abstract

ABSTRACT Both probability of default (PD) and loss given default (LGD) constitute relevant input parameters for credit risk management in pillars I and II. Assuming that both default data and loss data have been successfully collected and that PD and LGD estimators have been successfully obtained afterward, both parameters have to be validated in the following period(s). Whereas PD validation techniques have been intensively discussed in the past decade, quantitative LGD validation has not received sufficient attention in the literature, so far. In this light, the focus of this work is to summarize and classify, analyze and compare possible LGD validation instruments. Beyond that, possible extensions are introduced and discussed, and application is given to a hypothetical LGD data set.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2335488
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/7632/jrmv_fischer2_web.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2335488. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.