Author
Listed:
- Wei Chen and Jimmy Skoglund
Abstract
ABSTRACT Capturing tail events, especially those that include the rare possibility of severe loss, is one of the important objectives of modern risk analysis. However, the past behavior of financial data is not necessarily an accurate predictor of possible scenarios in the future. The economic turmoil of recent years has resulted in calls for a more forward-looking approach to financial risk management that integrates expert knowledge on plausible future scenarios with classical risk management models calibrated on past behavior. As a complementary risk analysis tool, stress testing is receiving more and more attention, both from regulators and from practitioners. Nevertheless, classical risk analysis models, such as value-at-risk models, that are based on historical data, are often disconnected from stress testing. This disconnection can prevent a comprehensive view of the risk profile of a financial institution. This paper proposes a multiperiod switching simulation based method for integrated stress testing risk analysis that incorporates plausible events that are not necessarily captured in historical data or in historical stressed calibration of risk models. Our application focuses on the integration of rare stress events and model stress into a market risk portfolio. However, the proposed method is also applicable to other financial risk models, eg, portfolio credit risk models. An integrated risk model and stress testing framework not only leads to forward-looking tail risk measurement, which mitigates the black swan effect, but also takes stress testing into advanced risk management decision making analysis, such as scenario-based portfolio optimization.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:rsk:journ5:2275643
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2275643. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.