IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/2161330.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stress-testing probability of default and migration rate with respect to Basel II requirements

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Miu, Bogie Ozdemir

Abstract

ABSTRACT Basel II implementation requires the estimation of probability of default (PD) and migration rate under hypothetical or historically observed stress scenarios. Typically, financial institutions first forecast selected macroeconomic variables under these stress scenarios and then estimate the corresponding stressed PD and migration rates. These stressed parameters are in turn used in estimating the capital requirement and marked-tomarket losses within the capital adequacy assessment framework. In this paper, we demonstrate a practical methodology to estimate both stressed PD and migration rates in a consistent fashion while conditioning on the selected explanatory variables. The estimation methodology allows for the robust use of external data, which is essential in the absence of long enough internal data. The proposed methodology is consistent with the economic model underlying the Basel II Pillar I risk-weight function, and it is compatible with the financial institutions' existing internal risk rating systems making the implementation and operations cost effective. It also allows for stress testing at the overall portfolio level as well as for specific industries. An example of its implementation in the oil and gas sector is provided at the end of the paper. Although the paper is presented within the context of Basel II implementation, the proposed approach can be used as a sound risk management practice to identify, examine and quantify the effect of stress events.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2161330
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/5065/jrm_v3n4a1.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2161330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.