IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/2161302.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Backtesting the RPIX inflation fan charts

Author

Listed:
  • Kevin Dowd

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper provides a systematic evaluation of the forecasting performance of the Bank of England's RPIX inflation fan charts. The tests are carried out on forecast data that have gone through probability integral and then Berkowitz transformations to become standard normal under the null hypothesis that the Bank's forecasts are adequate. These transformations are carried out for each of nine forecast horizons. Except for the transformed series over the first (ie, current-period) forecast horizon, these series are not predicted to be independent. The key problem in testing is then how to deal with this dependence structure; three alternative approaches are suggested to deal with this problem: ignoring the dependence structure, positing an AR(1) dependence structure and positing an MA(k + 1) dependence structure. Results indicate that there are serious problems with the fan chart forecasts whichever approach we take to the dependence structure, and the results for the longer horizon forecasts are especially poor. There can therefore be little doubt that the fan chart forecasts perform badly, especially over longer forecast horizons.

Suggested Citation

  • Kevin Dowd, . "Backtesting the RPIX inflation fan charts," Journal of Risk Model Validation, Journal of Risk Model Validation.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2161302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/journal-risk-model-validation/2161302/backtesting-rpix-inflation-fan-charts
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2161302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.