IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/2161272.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating and validating long-run probability of default with respect to Basel II requirements

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Miu, Bogie Ozdemir

Abstract

ABSTRACT Basel II adopting banks estimate and validate long-run probability of default (LRPD) for each of their internal risk ratings. In this study, we examine alternative methodologies in estimating and validating LRPD. We propose the maximum likelihood estimators incorporating both crosssectional and serial asset correlations while being consistent with the economic model underlying the Basel II capital requirement formulation. We first adopt Basel’s infinitely-granular portfolio assumption and propose a LRPD estimation methodology for regulatory capital estimation. We then relax this assumption to examine alternative estimation methodologies and their performances for a finite number of borrowers. Simulation-based performance studies show that the proposed estimators outperform the alternatives in terms of their accuracies even under a number of small sample settings. Using the simple average of default rates as an estimator is found to be prone to underestimation of LRPD. For the purpose of validating the assigned LRPD, we also examine alternative ways of establishing confidence intervals (CI). For most of the cases, the use of the CI constructed based on the proposed maximum likelihood estimators results in fewer errors in hypothesis tests. We show that the proposed method enables the use of external default rate data to supplement internal default rate data in attaining a more accurate and representative estimate of LRPD.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2161272
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/5008/jrm_v2n2a1.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2161272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.