IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/2161262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk capital stress-testing framework and the new capital adequacy rules

Author

Listed:
  • HÃ¥kan Andersson, Andreas Lindell

Abstract

ABSTRACT We propose a general framework for simulating the value of a financial portfolio over time. The main idea is to let experts specify the longterm behavior of the economy, and use statistical models to generate the behavior at intermediate time points. First, a set of expert scenarios specifying the values of the dominant risk factors at a few discrete time points is determined. Then, for each of these scenarios, a continuoustime model is specified that is consistent with the expert scenario. As a working example we simulate the equity of a model bank mainly involved in retail business activities, such as lending to households and small corporates, deposit services, brokerage and different types of payment services. We specify a continuous-time model for the bank's daily revenues and costs given expert scenarios specifying the long-term development of the macroeconomy, client volumes, margins and fees. The ruin probability, ie, the probability that the equity ever becomes negative, is investigated in some depth. Inspired by the work of Jokivuolle and Peura (2004), we also show how the new capital adequacy rules (Basel II) can be included in our framework. The Basel accord specifies calculation rules for the eligible capital as well as for the amount of risk (referred to as "Risk Weighted Assets") that the bank is exposed to. We perform a joint simulation of the capital and the risk weighted assets in order to investigate if the regulatory requirements are fulfilled in all the scenarios.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2161262
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/4998/jrm_v1n3a1.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2161262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.