IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/7959879.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing market sentiment based on the option-implied distribution of stock returns

Author

Listed:
  • Shu Ling Chiang
  • Ming Shann Tsai

Abstract

This paper provides a new measure for assessing market sentiment based on the option-implied distribution of stock returns generated from option data. We also analyze whether this measure is influenced by factors such as the stock price, the trading volume of the option, the option’s open interest, the trading volume of the stock, the volatility of the stock returns, the turnover ratio in the stock market and the put–call ratio. Data from the Taiwanese options market is employed to illustrate the application of the model. The empirical results can be summarized as follows: investors who trade options with longer maturities are more divergent in their expectations about future stock returns than those who trade options with shorter maturities; investors are more optimistic about future stock prices if the current stock price, the stock volatility, the stock and option trading volumes, and the put–call ratio increase; investors tend to be more pessimistic if the open interest and turnover ratio increase; and investors who hold options with longer maturities are more optimistic than investors who hold options with shorter maturities. Our analyses should help portfolio managers and investors better understand market sentiment and should act as guidelines for investment decisions so as to more efficiently optimize complicated portfolios and undertake optimal trading strategies.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7959879
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2024-08/jor_Tsai_web_final.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7959879. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.