IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/7958987.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Banking competition and systemic risk: evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Jiawei Guo
  • Jiwen Chai

Abstract

Based on data from 2008 to 2022 Q2, this paper examines the relationship between competition between China’s banks and the stability of the banking system. The impact of individual banks on the banking system is measured by the systemic conditional value-at-risk (CoVaR). This paper concludes that the increase in the level of bank competition is accompanied by a decrease in the level of systemic risk, and thus supports the competition stability hypothesis. Further, competition mainly reduces the externalities of risk spillovers by enhancing a bank’s risk awareness, improving its asset quality and its operating efficiency, and reducing any fluctuation in earnings. During the Covid-19 pandemic, the system stability effect of competition was most significant in large-scale commercial banks, such as state-owned commercial banks. This study provides empirical evidence for easing the entry restrictions of commercial banks and promoting the orderly opening and competition of new commercial banks.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7958987
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2024-02/jor_Guo_web_final.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7958987. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.