IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/7958945.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-factor default correlation model estimation: enhancement with bootstrapping

Author

Listed:
  • Zhihui Yang
  • Saikat Ray Majumder
  • Weiwei Shen
  • Stephane Karm
  • Douglas Cameron
  • James Gellert

Abstract

To assess the overall credit risk of a portfolio, it is important to consider the risk correlation between the counterparties (obligors) in addition to their individual credit risks. However, the estimation of the default correlations between obligors is challenging due to the scarcity of data and a lack of reporting default events as common practice. A constrained two-factor Merton correlation model with homogeneous risk classes has been proposed in the literature to achieve a balance between simplicity and usefulness. Yet, the assumption that assets are classified by two risk factors is practically oversimplified. Therefore, in this paper we extend the two-factor Merton correlation model into a three-factor Merton model to more realistically represent real-world practice. The maximum likelihood estimation and the grid search estimation methods for calibration are discussed in detail. For validation, we evaluate the robustness and stability of model parameters estimated from both methods on simulated and real-world default data. We also adopt the bootstrap approach to address the small sample size challenge of real-world data. The proposed model allows us to reveal the additional risk specification without sacrificing estimation accuracy. In addition, we present a convergence analysis to provide guidance on the number of observations to ensure stability of the calibrated maximum likelihood estimation.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7958945
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2024-02/jor_Majumder_web_final.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7958945. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.