IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/7958486.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conditional and unconditional intraday value-at-risk models: an application to high-frequency tick-by-tick exchange-traded fund data

Author

Listed:
  • Houmera Bibi Sabera Nunkoo
  • Noor-Ul-Hacq Sookia
  • Preethee Nunkoo Gonpot
  • Thekke Variyam Ramanathan

Abstract

Given the growing popularity of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the trading environment, this paper evaluates the performance of unconditional and conditional intraday value-at-risk (IVaR) models for high-frequency tick-by-tick ETF data. Three skewed distributions (the skewed t distribution, the skewed generalized error distribution and the skewed generalized t distribution) are used to generate unconditional IVaR. For conditional IVaR, a hybrid method combining the autoregressive conditional duration (ACD) model and the generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (GARCH) model is considered. We analyze 36 variations of the ACD-GARCH model, 35 of which have not been investigated before. Backtesting results show that the unconditional models are appropriate for the first 30 minutes of the trading session, emphasizing the need for a time-varying mean and volatility at longer forecast horizons. The conditional ACD-GARCH models underestimate the risk for midcap ETFs but are suitable for one-day ahead forecasting for small- and large-cap ETFs. The choice of the ACD form (ie, linear or nonlinear) and the error distribution have no impact on the validity of the ACD-GARCH model. Our results are of interest to financial practitioners involved in high-frequency trading and who rely on intraday risk measures to maintain sufficient capital to absorb and mitigate potential losses.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7958486
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2023-12/jor_Nunkoo_web_final.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7958486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.