IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/7957625.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The importance of being scrambled: supercharged quasi-Monte Carlo

Author

Listed:
  • Sergei Kucherenko
  • Julien Hok

Abstract

In many financial applications, the quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) method based on Sobolʹ low-discrepancy sequences (LDSs) outperforms the Monte Carlo (MC) method, showing faster and more stable convergence. However, unlike Monte Carlo, QMC lacks a practical error estimate. The randomized QMC (RQMC) method combines the best of both methods. The application of scrambled LDSs allows us to compute the confidence intervals around the estimated value, providing a practical error bound. The randomization of Sobolʹ LDSs is done via two methods: Owen’s scrambling and digital shift. These are then compared considering the computation of Asian options and Greeks using the hyperbolic local volatility model. RQMC demonstrates a superior performance to the standard QMC, showing increased convergence rates and providing practical error bounds around the estimated values. The efficiency of the RQMC method strongly depends on the scrambling methods used. We recommend using Sobolʹ LDSs with Owen’s scrambling. The application of effective dimension-reduction techniques such as the Brownian bridge or the principal component analysis is critical in order to dramatically improve the efficiency of QMC and RQMC methods based on Sobolʹ LDSs.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7957625
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2023-09/jor_Kucherenko_web_final.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7957625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.