IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/7955948.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Insurance institutional shareholding and banking systemic risk contagion: an empirical study based on a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator–vector autoregression high-dimensional network

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaotong Song
  • Tiancai Xing
  • Xiaoyi Li

Abstract

Insurance funds have attracted increasing attention as a large amount of long-term funds has been invested in the banking industry. Using the stock return data of Chinese-listed banks, this paper measures the systemic risk contagion effect of banks via the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator–vector autoregression (LASSO–VAR) high-dimensional method and generalized variance decomposition. It also investigates the threshold effect of insurance institutional shareholding on the systemic risk contagion of banks. The results show that shareholding by insurance institutions can curb the contagion of banking systemic risks. However, as the shareholding ratio increases, this inhibitory effect weakens. In the heterogeneity analysis, securities investment funds, trust funds and the Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor (QFII) program did not play a role in reducing systemic risk contagion, and traditional insurance and dividend insurance were the main insurance funds stabilizing the market. Further research finds that banks’ operating decisions and operating risks act as internal transmission channels for insurance institutional shareholding to reduce their risk spillover effect. This paper expands the research on the factors influencing bank systemic risk, which is of great significance for preventing and resolving bank systemic risk and promoting the sustainable and healthy development of the banking system.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7955948
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2023-02/jor_Song_web_final.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7955948. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.