IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/7946581.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market efficiency and volatility within and across cryptocurrency benchmark indexes

Author

Listed:
  • Dimitrios Koutsoupakis

Abstract

With initial coin offerings and token offerings remaining at the forefront of alternative investments, the study of peer groups can be important for comparing investors’ tastes and preferences for particular classes of cryptocurrency on a more equal footing. The aim of this paper is to identify violations of the weak-form market efficiency hypothesis for comparable cryptoassets that are conditional on market segmentation and those conditional on benchmarks. We use daily frequency data of 57 cryptocurrencies that account for more than 90% of the total market capitalization (market cap). We construct seven thematic market cap indexes that are able to represent the whole cryptocurrency universe. Against this background, we test for the presence of four empirical anomalies: risk premium, leverage, regime switch and calendar effects, both across and within these benchmark indexes. The main results support the existence of a switch between two states and positive excess returns toward the end of the week for both cases. Our methodology and findings contribute to the emerging literature on introducing active and passive portfolio management strategies that track benchmark crypto indexes.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7946581
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2022-05/Market_efficiency_and_volatility_within_and_across_cryptocurrency_benchmark_indexes_final.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7946581. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.