IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/7908056.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Test for fractional degree stochastic dominance with applications to stock preferences for China and the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Jianli Wang
  • Xiong Xiong
  • Lin Zhou
  • Xu Guo

Abstract

The concept of stochastic dominance plays a critical role in many economic and financial studies. However, the classical integer-degree stochastic dominance does not allow for local risk attitudes. In a 2020 paper, Huang, Tzeng and Zhao propose the concept of fractional degree stochastic dominance, which encompasses integer-degree stochastic dominance. They derive the integral conditions for fractional degree stochastic dominance. In this paper we develop the test statistics for fractional degree stochastic dominance based on a reformulation of the integral conditions. The test statistics’ asymptotic distributions are obtained and a bootstrap method for determining the critical values of the tests is also introduced. We further explore the stock preferences of the Chinese and US markets to illustrate the applicability of the test statistics for fractional degree stochastic dominance developed here.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7908056
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2021-12/Test_for_fractional_degree_stochastic_dominance_OE.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7908056. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.