IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/7885566.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systemic risk of the Chinese stock market based on the mobility measures of the marginal expected shortfall

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaohang Liu
  • Handong Li

Abstract

This paper applies the dynamic mixture copula model method and proposes a mobility measure of the marginal expected shortfall (MES) to depict the changing systemic risk in China’s mainland stock market and Hong Kong’s stock market. The empirical analysis focuses on the rank of individual stocks’ MES and the changes in the rank. The empirical results suggest that the mobility of MES is strong in the stable stage of the market, while the MES ranking of stocks tends to be disordered. When risk events occur, the MES ranking is relatively stable and the market risk is always affected by the same specific stocks. This property gives us a new perspective on risk management and deepens our understanding of the characteristics of systemic risk. In addition, most of the MES time series have strong long-term memory, which indicates that the risks of individual stocks have persistent impacts on the market’s systemic risk.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7885566
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2021-11/Systemic_risk_of_the_Chinese_stock_market_based_on_the_MES_final.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7885566. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.