Author
Abstract
The commonality in idiosyncratic volatility cannot be fully explained by time-varying volatility; correlated idiosyncratic volatility shocks are an important contributing factor. We empirically document this fact for various characteristic-sorted portfolios and industry portfolios. To capture the commonality in idiosyncratic volatility, we propose a novel multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (GARCH) model called dynamic factor correlation (DFC). The DFC model has a closed-form likelihood function that allows computationally cheap estimation, even for a large number of assets. The DFC model improves statistical fit compared with existing multivariate GARCH models such as the dynamic conditional correlation model and the dynamic equicorrelation (DECO) model, achieving the lowest root mean square error and mean absolute error in simulations. Empirical tests also corroborate simulations in demonstrating the improved statistical fit of the DFC model. Mean--variance portfolio optimization using the DFC model outperforms alternative volatility models such as the historical covariance matrix and the DECO model. Out-of-sample mean--variance-efficient portfolios using the DFC model have the lowest volatility and the highest Sharpe ratios, thereby improving the investor's opportunity set. Under parametric restrictions, the DFC model reduces to the constant conditional correlation model or the DECO model.
Suggested Citation
Xiao Qiao & Yongning Wang, .
"Correlated idiosyncratic volatility shocks,"
Journal of Risk, Journal of Risk.
Handle:
RePEc:rsk:journ4:7860436
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7860436. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.