IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/7797966.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A review of the foreign exchange base currency approach under the standardized approach of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book and issues related to the pegged reporting currency

Author

Listed:
  • Ted Yu

Abstract

The foreign exchange (FX) base currency approach under the standardized approach of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) has been newly introduced to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) standards to calculate the FX risk capital charge. This new approach acknowledges the triangular relationship of currency pairs and allows banks to calculate the FX risk relative to a base currency instead of to the reporting currency. When we adopt the parameters in the BCBS standards to calculate the delta risk charge, anomalies in the risk charges for the same risk exposure are found under different approaches and under different reporting currencies. The anomalies increase when the approach applies to a pegged reporting currency. We provide numerical examples to explain the reason for the variance and to prove that the delta risk charge for spot FX portfolios should be invariant for any reporting currency given that an appropriate correlation is set. We also propose a workable solution with a minimal change to the BCBS standards to solve the anomalies for the pegged reporting currency.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7797966
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2021-02/A_review_of_the_FX_base_currency_approach_final.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7797966. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.