IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/7421876.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An internal default risk model: simulation of default times and recovery rates within the new Fundamental Review of the Trading Book framework

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Bertagna
  • Dragos Deliu
  • Luca Lopez
  • Aldo Nassigh
  • Michele Pioppi
  • Fabian Reffel
  • Peter Schaller
  • Robert Schulze

Abstract

In January 2016, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published its new requirements for the calculation of market risk within the banking sector. These requirements go under the name of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book. The default risk model is one part of these requirements that is subject to material changes: recovery rates must be stochastic variables, basis risk due to differences in recoveries have to be considered, and a dependence between recovery rates and systematic risk factors used to simulate default times must be enforced. This paper presents a new default risk model for market risk that is consistent with these requirements. The recovery rates follow a waterfall model that is based on a minimum entropy principle. Moreover, the model features correlation between default times and stochastic recovery rates by exploiting the observed correlation between default frequency and average recoveries in historical data. As well as giving some mathematical background, the authors;present the numerical results and the impacts of the various model parameters. These show that the introduced correlation can have a significant impact on the capital charge.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7421876
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2020-02/jor_reffel_web.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7421876. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.