IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/7421841.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hedging incentives for financial institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Frans de Weert

Abstract

Using a simple model, this paper derives two results that provide guiding principles for hedging by, and capital regulation of, financial institutions. First, the adoption of value- maximizing hedging strategies by financial institutions minimizes the volatility of the regulatory capital ratio. The hedging incentives for financial institutions can therefore differ from those of nonfinancial firms, as it is commonly argued that nonfinancial firms have an incentive to reduce the volatility of cashflows. Second, asset substitution incentives for financial institutions are eliminated if and only if the regulatory capital ratio correlates perfectly with the market value of equity. This implies that, in order to eliminate asset substitution incentives for financial institutions, it is not sufficient for the capital requirements to be proportional to the systematic risks (the betas) of the assets. This result is consistent with the regulatory response to the global financial crisis, as the Basel III regulatory framework for banks focuses on aligning the regulatory definition of available capital with the market value of equity.

Suggested Citation

  • Frans de Weert, . "Hedging incentives for financial institutions," Journal of Risk, Journal of Risk.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7421841
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2020-02/jor_de_weert_web.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7421841. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.