IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/7370751.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical analysis of oil risk-minimizing portfolios: the DCC–GARCH–MODWT approach

Author

Listed:
  • Dejan Zivkov
  • Jovan Njegic
  • Vladimir Zakic

Abstract

This paper strives to analyze hedging strategies between Brent oil and six other heterogeneous assets – American ten-year bonds, US dollars, gold, natural gas futures, corn futures, and Europe, Australasia and Far East exchange-traded funds (EAFE- ETFs) – observing five wavelet time horizons and considering three different risk metrics: variance, value-at-risk (VaR) and conditional value-at-risk (CVaR). The authors;constructs two-asset portfolios, whereby conditional variances and covariances are obtained via a bivariate rolling dynamic conditional correlation–generalized autore- gressive conditional heteroscedasticity (DCC–GARCH) model. Results indicate that gold is the best combination with Brent for minimum-variance investors, while the Brent–natural gas pair produces the worst minimum-variance results due to the very high unconditional variance of gas. As for VaR and CVaR results, the authors;find that Brent with gold gives relatively good outcomes, but the portfolio with gas heavily outperforms the portfolio with gold when one views longer time horizons. This happens because the Brent–gas portfolio has very low skewness and kurtosis on longer time horizons compared with the unhedged portfolio, and these characteristics favor good VaR and CVaR results. These findings could help global portfolio managers and investors who seek various ways to diversify their Brent oil investments, who act on different time horizons, and who target different risk-minimizing goals.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7370751
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2020-02/jor_zivkov_web.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7370751. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.