IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/6710771.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From log-optimal portfolio theory to risk measures: logarithmic expected shortfall

Author

Listed:
  • G. Arici
  • M. Dalai
  • R. Leonardi

Abstract

Historically, risk measures have been used for single-period investments, and this has prevented their application by investors willing to reinvest their wealth for more than one period. Due to its intuitive definition and coherent properties, one of the most widely adopted risk measures is expected shortfall (ES). This is defined as a tail expectation; it therefore gives the same weight to all of the losses involved in an average calculation. Here, we propose a modification of ES that does not treat all losses equally. We do this in order to represent the worries surrounding big drops that are typical of multiperiod investors. Our version of ES exploits Kelly’s logarithmic utility function to penalize heavier losses. This enables us to avoid investments that may expose the investor to bad circumstances from which it would be too hard to recover. An analysis of our results using synthetic and real data is offered in order to certify the viability of the proposed method.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:6710771
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2019-12/From_log-optimal_portfolio_theory_to_risk_measures_final.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:6710771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.