IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/6569671.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Could holding multiple safe havens improve diversification in a portfolio? The extended skew-t vine copula approach

Author

Listed:
  • Meng-Shiuh Chang
  • Jing Yuan
  • Jing Xu

Abstract

We propose a vine copula model based on a bivariate extended skew-t distribution and derive its corresponding multivariate tail dependence function. Our simulations demonstrate that the proposed estimator dominates the conventional vine copula approach in the estimation of multivariate tail dependence. We apply our model to a safe haven analysis of US dollars (US$) and gold prices against stocks. The estimated multivariate lower tail dependence coefficients suggest that even though either US$ or gold can be safe haven assets against stocks, combining US$ and gold in a portfolio does not provide a safe haven property ;against stocks. Therefore, incor- porating multiple safe haven assets in a portfolio may end in heavier losses in the event of a market downturn. Our results highlight the importance of simultaneously investigating multiple safe haven assets in financial risk analysis.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:6569671
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2019-04/Could_holding_multiple_safe_havens_improve_diversification_in_a_portfolio.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:6569671. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.