IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/5784701.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forecasting corporate defaults in the German stock market

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Lennart Mertens
  • Thorsten Poddig
  • Christian Fieberg

Abstract

In this paper, we estimate and test several default risk models using new and unique data on corporate defaults in the German stock market. While defaults were extremely rare events in the 1990s, they have been a characteristic feature of the German stock market since the early 2000s. Here, we apply the structural Merton distance to default (DD) as well as several reduced-form models. A variety of performance evaluation tools, including receiver-operating-characteristics analysis, calibration tests and a loan market simulation, are used, which suggest that the Campbell, Hilscher and Szilagyi failure score outperforms the other models. Although the performance evaluation metrics show that the failure score performs slightly worse in our case than for US data, we recommend it as a benchmark default risk model for research as well as the industry. We show that lenders who apply this model are more profitable than those who apply others. Moreover, we warn of several pitfalls associated with the Altman z-score and the DD. The former has very weak discriminatory power and the latter is severely miscalibrated.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:5784701
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2018-08/Forecasting_corporate_defaults_in_the_German_stock_market.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:5784701. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.