IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/5746576.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

BV–VPIN: Measuring the impact of order flow toxicity and liquidity on international equity markets

Author

Listed:
  • Rand Low
  • Te Li
  • Terry Marsh

Abstract

Order flow toxicity is the measure of a trader’s exposure to the risk that counterparties possess private information or other informational advantages. High levels of order flow toxicity can culminate in market makers providing liquidity at a loss or in the suboptimal execution of trades. From a regulatory perspective, high levels of toxicity can be harmful to overall market liquidity and precede precipitous drops in asset prices. The bulk volume–volume-synchronized probability of informed trading (BV–VPIN) model is one way of measuring the “toxicity†component of order flow, and it has been successfully applied in high-frequency trading environments. We apply the BV–VPIN to daily data from a range of international indexes in order to extend previous analyses of its properties. We find that a rise in BV–VPIN effectively foreshadows high levels of volatility in the equity indexes of several countries. If a BV–VPIN futures;contract were to exist, we show that it would exhibit safe haven characteristics during market downturns. In particular, a simple active portfolio management strategy that times investments in equities (risk-free assets) when BV–VPIN levels are low (high) outperforms a buy-and-hold strategy. Thus, we find support for the application of BV–VPIN in international equity markets as a risk monitoring and management tool for portfolio managers and regulators.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:5746576
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2018-12/BV%E2%80%93VPIN.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:5746576. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.