IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/5722651.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation window strategies for value-at-risk and expected shortfall forecasting

Author

Listed:
  • Tobias Berens
  • Gregor Weiß
  • Daniel Ziggel

Abstract

Compared with the large number of value-at-risk (VaR) and expected shortfall (ES) forecasting models proposed in the literature, few contributions have been made to address the question of which estimation window strategy is preferable for forecasting these risk measures. To fill this gap, we apply different estimation window strategies to a set of simple parametric, semiparametric and nonparametric industry-standard risk models. Analyzing daily return data on constituents of the German Deutscher Aktienindex (DAX), we evaluate forecasts by backtesting the unconditional coverage and independent and identically distributed properties of VaR violations, the ES forecasting accuracy and the conditional predictive ability. We thereby demonstrate that the selection of the estimation window strategy leads to significant performance differences. The results indicate that forecast combinations are the preferable estimation window strategy.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:5722651
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2018-06/Estimation_window_strategies_for_VaR_and_ES_forecasting.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:5722651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.