IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/5312466.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A vine copula–GARCH approach to corporate exposure management

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher M. Wells
  • Ahmad Farhat
  • Christopher Richardson
  • T. Ryan Deering

Abstract

We apply vine copulas with generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (GARCH) marginals to the problem of capturing asset dependence and tail dynamics for currency and commodity exposures commonly found in portfolios of global corporates. This approach permits a more realistic description of both the pairwise dependence of asset prices and the large movements of a given asset, ie, fat tails. We compare the cashflow-at-risk, expected tail loss, backtest performance and optimal hedging order for this approach to both the traditional Gaussian model and the analogous t-copula fit for a pair of hypothetical corporate portfolios. Our results suggest that, while more traditional models may be adequate to capture either tail behavior or dependence adequately for a given portfolio at a given time, vine–GARCH models more consistently capture both dependence and tail risks and thus offer a more reliable estimate of the risk held in a portfolio and better hedge performance. In particular, the likelihood of so-called black swan events is much more accurately predicted. Finally, we introduce a set of diagnostics used to measure the relative quality of the developed models for the purposes of model selection, and validate our choice of measures against the results of backtesting.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:5312466
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2017-08/A_vine_copula_GARCH_Approach_to_corporate_exposure_management_online_early_1.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:5312466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.