IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/2453671.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Outperforming benchmarks with their derivatives: theory and empirical evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Alejandro Balbás
  • Beatriz Balbás
  • Raquel Balbás

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recent literature has demonstrated the existence of an unbounded risk premium if one combines the most important models for pricing and hedging derivatives with;coherent risk measures. There may exist combinations of derivatives (good deals) whose pair (return risk) converges to the pair (+∞, −∞). This paper goes beyond;existence properties and looks for optimal explicit constructions and empirical tests. It will be shown that the optimal good deal above may be a simple portfolio of options. This theoretical finding will enable us to implement empirical experiments involving three international stock index futures (Standard & Poor's 500, Eurostoxx 50 and DAX 30) and three commodity futures (gold, Brent and the Dow Jones-UBS Commodity Index). According to the empirical results, the good deal always outperforms the underlying index/commodity. The good deal is built in full compliance with the standard derivative pricing theory. Properties of classical pricing models totally inspire the good deal construction. This is a very interesting difference in our paper with respect to previous literature attempting to outperform a benchmark.

Suggested Citation

  • Alejandro Balbás & Beatriz Balbás & Raquel Balbás, . "Outperforming benchmarks with their derivatives: theory and empirical evidence," Journal of Risk, Journal of Risk.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:2453671
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk/2453671/outperforming-benchmarks-with-their-derivatives-theory-and-empirical-evidence
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:2453671. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.