IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/2421574.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Commodity risk hedging through risk sharing: reengineering Islamic forwards

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Kafou and Ahmed Chakir

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this paper, we study the possibility of using Islamic forwards, which are commonly known as salam contracts, to hedge commodity risk, while respecting the principle of risk sharing. Results show that this can be achieved by considering a stochastic forward price. In addition, splitting the deal into many salam contracts that have the same characteristics with regard to size and delivery date almost removes the zero-sum structure of salam's payoffs. To compute the number of needed contracts, we use a Monte Carlo simulation. The estimated number is large and increases with price volatility. Nevertheless, when this volatility exceeds a certain threshold, keeping one contract becomes the optimal solution for risk sharing. The relatively large number of needed contracts renders the splitting impracticable. Therefore, it is reduced to a number that both parties of the deal can agree upon. Finally, this hedging strategy is only possible within a mutual risk-sharing arrangement, because the price in salam must be specified; otherwise, the contract is void.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:2421574
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/9110/Commodity_risk_hedging_through_risk_sharing_reengineering_Islamic_forwards.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:2421574. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.