IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/2376572.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are traders’ rules useful for pricing options? Evidence from intraday data

Author

Listed:
  • Sol Kim

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines the pricing performance of option pricing models by using intraday data on KOSPI 200 index options. We consider the Black-Scholes model, the ad hoc Black-Scholes model (ie, traders' rules), the stochastic volatility model and the stochastic volatility model with jumps. In contrast to the findings of Jackwerth and Rubinstein, Li and Pearson, and Kim, who used daily data, our results suggest that the best model for pricing options is the most complicated model, that is, the stochastic volatility model with jumps, followed by the stochastic volatility model. This indicates that, for intraday data, traders' rules do not dominate mathematically sophisticated models, and complicated models can outperform simple traders' rules or the Black-Scholes model. ;

Suggested Citation

  • Sol Kim, . "Are traders’ rules useful for pricing options? Evidence from intraday data," Journal of Risk, Journal of Risk.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:2376572
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk/2376572/are-traders-rules-useful-for-pricing-options-evidence-from-intraday-data
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:2376572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.