Author
Listed:
- Wei Chen and Jimmy Skoglund
Abstract
ABSTRACT The replication of a portfolio of cashflow instruments with another set of cashflow instruments is frequently used in pricing and hedging. For example, replicating deposits with tradable bonds allows the treasurer to determine an approximate fair value of deposits and to implement hedging schemes. In these applications, the replication of deposits with tradable instruments is crucial, as this restates the problem of pricing and hedging deposits as a standard problem of market instrument valuation and hedging. In an insurance context, a replicating portfolio is also used to replace nontradable policies, such as life annuities, with a best-hedging tradable cashflow portfolio. Again, the transformation of nontradable balance sheet items into replicating tradable instruments allows hedging schemes and other forms of analysis, such as asset and liability management, to be implemented with respect to the market-traded replicating portfolio. When applying a replicating portfolio, a key issue is what asset instruments should be used for replication in order to achieve a minimal cashflow deviation. Having determined the set of assets to use for replication, the next key step is to determine a model for replication error measurement and other features of the replicating portfolio, such as the cost. In this paper, we describe an efficient linear program approach to cashflow replication. This program explicitly controls the replication error using mismatch constraints with user-defined tolerance levels for absolute and tail mismatch. By controlling the cashflow mismatch using constraints, the nonfeasibility of any given asset portfolio simply indicates a bad choice of replicating instruments, or a bad choice of constraints. For feasible problems, the linear optimization finds the minimal-cost portfolio of the feasible set. The cashflow optimization approach with cashflow mismatch constraints has significant advantages over naive approaches to cashflow replication that directly minimize the cashflow deviation between the portfolios.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:rsk:journ4:2180969
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:2180969. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.