IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/2161143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An empirical comparison of methods for incorporating fat tails into value-at-risk models

Author

Listed:
  • Vijay Pant and Weita Chang

Abstract

ABSTRACT The authors compare three techniques commonly used to incorporate fat-tailed asset returns in value-at-risk (VaR) models - modeling the asset returns as a Bernoulli mixture of normal distributions, as a Student t-distribution, or using a stochastic volatility model. In order to perform this comparison, the VaR is computed for three sample portfolios using each of these models over a period of time. These VaR estimates are then compared with each other in order to understand the magnitude of the possible variance in VaR due to the choice of model.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:2161143
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/10089/JoR46.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:2161143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.