IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/2161124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Misspecified copulas in credit risk models: how good is Gaussian?

Author

Listed:
  • Alfred Hamerle, Daniel Rösch

Abstract

ABSTRACT In addition to “classical” approaches, such as the Gaussian CreditMetrics or Basel II model, the use of other copulas has recently been proposed in the area of credit risk for modeling loss distributions, particularly T copulas which lead to fatter tails ceteris paribus. As an amendment to recent research this paper shows some estimation results when the copula in a default-mode framework using a latent variable distribution is misspecified. It turns out that parameter estimates may be biased, but that the resulting forecast for the loss distribution may still be adequate. We also compare the performance of the true and misspeci fied models with respect to estimation risk. Finally, we demonstrate the ideas using rating agencies data and show a simple way of dealing with estimation risk in practice. Overall, our findings on the robustness of the Gaussian copula considerably reduce model risk in practical applications.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:2161124
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/4913/jor_v8n1a3.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:2161124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.