IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/2161066.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Kernel quantile based estimation of expected shortfall

Author

Listed:
  • Keming Yu, Abdallah K. Ally, Shanchao Yang, David J. Hand

Abstract

ABSTRACT Since its proposal as an alternative risk measure to value-at-risk (VaR), expected shortfall (ES) has attracted a great deal of attention in financial risk management, primarily owing to its coherent properties. Recently, there has been an upsurge of research on the estimation of ES from a nonparametric perspective. The focus of this paper is on a few kernel-based ES estimators, including jackknife-based bias-correction estimators that have theoretically been documented to reduce bias. Bias reduction is particularly effective in reducing the tail estimation bias as well as the consequential bias that arises in kernel smoothing and finite-sample fitting and, thus, serves as a natural approach to the estimation of extreme quantiles of asset price distributions. By taking advantage of ES as an integral of the quantile function, a new type of ES estimator is proposed. To compare the performance of the estimators, a series of comparative simulation studies are presented and the methods are applied to real data. An estimator that has an analytical form turned out to perform the best.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:2161066
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/10394/Kernel_quantile_based_estimation_of_expected_shortfall.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:2161066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.